A Compendium of the Quaker (Nordic)
Calvert’s
Whose origin is found at Morsham Near Guisbrough
Yorkshire, England
(A genealogical and Historical View)
Compiled by David Edwin
Bell
Permission is granted to cite or quote parts of this work. Republication is strictly
prohibited
(reformatted material from printed form to fit the format of the blogspot)
THE EARLY
QUAKER CALVERTS The
first record of the Armagh Quaker Calvert‘s is John Calvert, born
in Moore Soome ("ne‘ere Gisborough") Yorkshire, England,
as recorded in Lurgan register transcripts of the Society of Friends
in a record of the marriage of his son, Thomas Calvert. Buckey claims
a birth date of 1578/9, and a migration to County Armagh, Ulster
Province, Ireland by 1617.
Thomas Calvert was born in 1617 –
Albert Cook Myers claims that same year for his migration. Great
Moorsham was a township in the parish of Skelton, East Division of
Langbaurgh 6 miles from Guisbrough, containing 338 inhabitants(circa
1830).[1] The occasion for the presence of our Calvert‘s in Ulster
Province of Ireland was the forced removal of the native Irish
tenants from their lands, and the subsequent "plantation"
of these lands by Scottish and English colonists.
The Specifics for John Calvert coming
to Ireland with his family before 1617 are not certain. We estimate
the time frame to have been sometime between 1610 when the Ulster
Plantation settlements were approved and funded but we do not know
which year. We do know that his son Thomas was born in County Armagh,
Ulster Plantation Settlement in 1617. We do not even know the
religion which they professed but certainly they became Quaker, or at
least Grace did so. John Calvert is buried at the Quaker Burying
Grounds, hence at least accepted by the Quakers of the faith.
We don't yet know who the father of John Calvert was. There are seven wills that I am awaiting retrieval from Yorkshire but at the time of this publishing, the offices in Yorks are closed. One of the potential ancestors is Thomas Calvert of Whitby Hall. If Thomas were named for the grandfather, it's possible that Thomas of Whitby Hall is his grandfather. William Calvert of Yorks is an appropriate Calvert as well.
an old view of Whiteby Abbey from a post card - Whitby hall lay near the abbey
We don't yet know who the father of John Calvert was. There are seven wills that I am awaiting retrieval from Yorkshire but at the time of this publishing, the offices in Yorks are closed. One of the potential ancestors is Thomas Calvert of Whitby Hall. If Thomas were named for the grandfather, it's possible that Thomas of Whitby Hall is his grandfather. William Calvert of Yorks is an appropriate Calvert as well.
an old view of Whiteby Abbey from a post card - Whitby hall lay near the abbey
Whitby Abbey would have been a focal point for the area in which John Calvert was born. If Thomas of Whitby Hall were his father, he was associated with the Abbey.
Whitby Hall as it stands today(it is now a museum - source Alarmy
We do know that John Calvert's son Thomas and his family became converted to the Quaker faith in the latter part of the century, probably between 1655 and 1670. This religion, first preached by George Fox in England in the late 1640's, was, by 1654 spread all about England and across to Ireland to when the first meeting of the Society of Friends was held at Lurgan, Co. Armagh.
Whitby Hall as it stands today(it is now a museum - source Alarmy
We do know that John Calvert's son Thomas and his family became converted to the Quaker faith in the latter part of the century, probably between 1655 and 1670. This religion, first preached by George Fox in England in the late 1640's, was, by 1654 spread all about England and across to Ireland to when the first meeting of the Society of Friends was held at Lurgan, Co. Armagh.
Since John is buried in their
cemetery, we know that he lived beyond this date in all likelihood.
[2,IBID]
The strong growth of Quakerism that
followed in the next two decades probably brought our Calvert’s
into the fold. Life for the Quakers and the Scottish
Presbyterians was exceedingly
difficult during this period. [3]. Aside from the earlier native
Irish raids, they were subject to a ruling class who belonged to the
Church of England, and who oppressed not only the native Irish, but also those of other
religions. Among other things, they demanded and took excessive
tithes to maintain their own church, with harsh Penalties for those
not conforming. Any hoped for cessation of the oppression with the
return of the Stuarts (Charles II) to the Crown in 1670 did not
occur, and a result was the 17th and 18th century migrations of
Ulster Scots and our own Quakers to the colonies in America. [4]
After Removal from County Armagh and
elsewhere, the Quakers were granted land in William Penn's colony of
Pennsylvania which at that time included the lower
three counties that became colonial Delaware, the site of our
Calvert's first home in America. [ Note
to the reader: From time to time, new records
are found. When
they are added, they will be Highlighted in red script; see
Chapter 2.-
compiler]
The
Calverts of the Ulster Plantation Settlement 1610-1650, The Lord’s
Baltimore and Origin for both, in Yorkshire
It is certain that John Calvert of
Mooresome(Morsham, Morsholm sic) Near Guisbrough in Yorkshire,
England, indeed removed to Ireland and lived in the County Armagh in
the early 1600s. By the year 1617 his family has settled and his
first son was born as is evidenced by the Quaker Records of Lurgan.
Most researchers ascribe John‘s removal in 1617(or thereabouts).
That date might well be considered as between 1610 and 1617. Some of
children of John were probably born in England though and he may have
married at least twice. There is no primary source evidence of other
children but there appears to be reason to believe that this indeed
was the case. Nine others have been variously associated with John
Calvert of Yorkshire. [5]
It is known that Thomas Calvert,
John‘s son, was born in 1617 County Armagh, Ireland This settlement
of Ireland occurred during King James Reign and was part of the
Ulster Plantation project which was begun in 1610. The import of this
was two-fold - to claim the lands that were held by the crown in
Ireland and to remove from the border of England, some of the
problematic thorns in the side to English interests in Scotland.
Thus, I would say that John removed to Ulster Plantation
settlement sometime between 1610 and the birth of his son Thomas in
1617. He was born according to birth records of the Quaker Meeting at
Lurgan, County Armagh, IR to John and wife Grace [--?--]. He may also
have marrie a “Gwale”.Calvert. [6]
The Calvert family ,
Vis-a-vis´ George
Calvert's introduction to the House of Lords as he was Knighted, Lord
of Baltimore of Ireland, descends from a noble and influential family
of Flanders, ostensibly in the Netherlands of the era and taking
influential places in the various Monarchies of Western Europe.
According to most of the researchers,
it appears that the earliest of these was John, who came from
Flanders to England and settled apparently in the north country of
England. He had three sons, Leonard, John and William, who is
documented via his will. [7]
The
Plantation Settlement of 1610
The folk who came to Ireland settled
in Ulster province, at the bequest of James I whose affinity with the
Scots and Northern English persuaded him to ensure English Settlement
and control of Northern Ireland, subduing some of the wilds in the
process, subdue the unruly primitive Irish peoples and to provide
economic benefit for the realm. He was known for his robust economic
expansion actions, but they had the opposite effect. James was an
adherent of the
―Divine Right of Kings‖
which then would be juxtaposed to the authority of the Pope. [8]
We might view this all the way
forward to Napoleons coronation of himself. The Sun King, Louis XIV,
who bankrupted France with the many wars of his reign, was also an
adherent to this Divine right which lead to the rebellion of the
French revolution and the execution of a monarch in that State.
Surely, Cromwell in England would remove a king in opposition this
construct, and then would ensure that Martin Luther would turn over
in his grave at the resulting oppression of the self-elect of the
communism of the glorious revolution, the kings of various German
states experiencing similar revolts.
I must imagine how this whole picture
must have come to roost – I believe it is important to understand
the scheme of things England at least, as the material for the Quaker
Calvert‘s is presented. This is not a History of England or its
monarchs, though I will do a little bit of preliminary presentation
in order to see the history of the Calvert‘s who were Quaker and
their genealogies within the framework of the milieu in which they
lived.
Too, I am not sure that I have a good
handle on the Shenanigans of how James the VI of Scotland came to be
sovereign of all England. It is certainly an historical shenanigan
which begins long before James was seated on the thrown of Scotland,
thus having its roots in the reign of King Henry VIII, certainly
having to do with his intense desire to have a male heir to the
crown.
Further, having to do with Elizabeth,
who did not name a male successor, or any at all, hoping to avoid
conflict within the many factions who would seek power after her
death in 1603.
James‘ mother would not provide a
legitimate holder of the throne, at least within the scheme of
patriarchal succession to the throne of England, where events,
intrigues, and struggles came to a fruition which was certainly not
anticipated by Henry VIII, sans having a protestant succeed him. The
story is worthy of any theatrical, and it was, witness the play by
William Shakespeare.
The machinations of Henry the VIII in
seeking a wife to bare him a son and heir resulted in the beheading
of his wife, Ann Boleyn. In succession, Henry took four wives, had
marriages annulled, warred with Thomas a‘Becket and had him
executed. Henry himself was only the second Monarch in the line of
Tudors, the first being his father, Henry VII, whose intrigue and
relationship with
his wife, Katherine of Aragon, is worthy of more ―humor.
[10]
All in all I keep in mind that this
is occurring in the midst of the Protestant Reformation, and the
migration of the families into Ireland would occur early in the reign
of James VI to the English Thrown—more on that later. The Chair of
the History Department, Fr. Huger would continually stress the
intellectual and social history which accompanied the events that
were more obvious and more frequent in terms of use and remembrance.
It is from this background view that I am attempting to set the stage
for the Quaker Migration into Ulster.
Martin Luther, a priest and scholar,
had published his theses and the Pope had
demanded a retraction which of course Luther refused. In 1521 Luther
was excommunicated by Pope Leo X. {11, 11a, 11b] In this year, Luther
published which his work, ―On
Monastic Vows‖
[12] which disavowed any scriptural origin for monasticism. He
further did the unthinkable, publishing the Bible in the German
language.
In
the midst of the ―protestant reformation, [13] Henry is seeking a
male heir, desiring and obtaining the vast wealth of the papacy in
Rome and forcing the final break of association of the Church of
England and Rome. It was Henry who became the true―bull.[*]
[14] in the financial, moral and ethical China closet during the
waning of the powers and influence of Rome in England assuredly but
in all of western Europe as well, thus bringing to conclusion that
which had begun in the 15th century. Henry dissolved the Catholic
Monasteries, nunneries and friaries in England, part of which was the
lucrative acquisition of properties papal, a significant event which
should be viewed as a seizure in the outright. Further, via Henry,
any assets of the French Monarchs and Catholic institutions, were
seized, Henry himself.
* here I am alluding of course, to a
Papal Bull.
Perhaps the reason that Henry sought
so strenuously to establish a male succession to the throne by edict
and statute was the tenuous claim to the crown by his father, Henry
VII (Henry Tudor). After Agincourt, Henry was to claim the throne via
the auspice of his maternal line, for now we are in the previous
lineage of succession, Henry‘s mother being a great grand-daughter
of John of Gaunt of the House of Lancaster. Here is the tie of the
Calvert‘s lord Baltimore then and why one must examine the
relationship of the families of power and succession, witness the
marriage of the Second Lord Baltimore, Cecilius, to Anne Arundel, the
Arundel‘s being in the descent of John of Gaunt. This would then
provide a more pronounce view of the exemplification of Knighthood
and cote de arms of George Calvert, of an influential family of
origin at Warvickhoe with its own cote de arms.[13]
Neither was Elizabeth, daughter of
Henry VIII, what he envisioned, I am sure. She was not the
appropriate sex for the succession, pax patriarchal. Nor was her
rival in Scotland, Mary, or for that matter. Of course Henry the
VIII, with his marriages and attempts to gain a male heir lead us
into the events surrounding the first decade of the 17th Century, the
accession of James VI to the throne, the continuation of the
Elizabeth settlement of Ireland and in particular the establishment
of the Ulster Plantation Settlement by edict in 1610.
An element of the succession was the
relationship of Mary as monarch of Scotland, succeeded by her son
James VI of Scotland, shortly to become King of England. In Henry‘s
view, Mary would have no claim at all being foreign born and
Elizabeth, sometimes called the Virgin Queen, would be the
inappropriate choice for a male heir which should be of male to male
descent; Mary and Elizabeth could bear a son to inherit the throne,
but only after instatement of additional rulings, which indeed called
for the male issue of Henry VII and his will to determine the
succeeding Monarch.
Henry had of course a plan for a male
heir. But should he die, then it would devolve, through the very
legal contrivance to establish his own male descent for the throne,
to Mary Queen of Scots, who had previously been, Mary Queen of France
until her husband‘s death at which time she returned to Scotland.
With the birth of her son James, she
was forced to abdicate the throne of Scotland in his favor, and in
this manner did James VI come to the throne of Scotland and
eventually, England. Odd too is the fact that his mother had to flee
Scotland, sought protection from Elizabeth, but was executed in
England.
This surely was not the condition or
male heir should live to receive coronation.
In this odd manner would the result
of the mechanisms of Henry himself, the crown would devolve to Lady
Frances of the House of Suffolk, the King‘s niece, eldest daughter
of his sister Mary, Queen of France or Lady Eleanor, second daughter
of Mary, and then who? What occurred was the Mary Queen of Scots,
became plausible due to an adroit and apparently sincere fear of a
Papal successor. This then caused Henry VIII to look to statutes
issued by himself and in
view of his marriages,
annulled or not, but at least there was support in the end for some
sort of conclusion, which due to the machinations of Henry, fell to a
foreign born Successor. It became clearly obvious that should Henry
VII die, Henry VIII not having male issue, the throne would pass to
the male issue of Margaret Queen of Scots, who was James VI of
Scotland.
Which is exactly what occurred, with
male issue of Henry VII not surviving, Henry VIII having no male
heir, and despite all of his machinations, the Crown of England
passed to a—oh, heavens, Scot, which was James VI of Scotland.
Perhaps as an end result, Henry would have felt this apropos as the
monarchial success was not determined by a Pope.
the author of a magazine article
regarding the accession of James I observes in his forward to the
article:
In June 1603, just after the
accession of James I, the Venetian ambassador in London was chatting
to Lord Kinloss, a Scottish nobleman and royal confidant. Kinloss
mentioned the anxieties the king endured before coming to the English
throne, but added 'by a Divine miracle all has gone well'. James
himself was convinced that his safe arrival on the throne formerly
occupied by Queen Elizabeth was literally God-designed, in order to
bring the two realms of England and Scotland closer together.
However, for all the talk about miracles, the reality was more
prosaic.
In the early hours of 24 March 1603,
Elizabeth I died at Richmond. The 'Virgin Queen' made no explicit
provision for an heir, fearing that she might encourage faction
within her kingdom. Yet James VI of Scotland was smoothly proclaimed
as the new king. There was no opposition, but equally no immediate
celebration. The London diarist John Manningham slyly noted that the
proclamation was met with 'silent joye, noe great shouting', although
there were bonfires and bell-ringing that evening as the announcement
sank in. Three days later in Edinburgh, the king himself received the
news with exultation.” [15]
Should you doubt that the issues with
the protestant North of Ireland not be at issue, one has only to
observe the actions of some of my own family. Lola Viva Sargent Bell,
my grandmother, had a very intense dislike of all things papist. She
would only be attended at hospital at Freeman in Joplin, and never at
St. John‘s, a Catholic Institution begun by Nuns. Viva also
vocalizing periodically about the events of the Church of Rome and
its adherents, always to the negative.
I must also admit that my grandfather
also had no use for Catholics, his grandfather having arrived on the
near shore(Hemingford, Quebec) from Ireland, County Armagh, after his
great-grandfather had his tongue cut out during sectarian strife
among protestant and catholic in the very same province about which
our current review is involved. Indeed, John Bell‘s(Who died from
his injury after the attack) was married and had issue. His wife was
Margaret O‘Faloon(Fallon). John’s Brother-in-law, William John
Fallon was also murdered by Catholics in his public house. Both men
owned a public house and jointly owned a distillery in west Belfast.
Both families fled Ireland and arrived in Quebec shortly after these
violent events, and in their historical allegiance they quickly
crossed the St. Lawrence to Mooers, Clinton County, NY. The Bell
family view my attending a Jesuit institution with some trepidation.
It is also odd, or, perhaps
providential that Sir Robert Cecil, Secretary to the King, would
later have as his protégé, George Calvert in that James VI of
Scotland had many communications with Sir Cecil. [19]
From these letters
it is easy to see the ―politic‖
of Cecil in his communication with the king, as witnessed by his
judicious treatment of controversial issues in correspondence with
James in 1600 and 1601. From the machinations of Henry, to dealing
with Elizabeth and her succession, there is plenty of intrigue in
which to involve oneself in British History if one so chooses. And to
be truthful, I am not
well enough versed except to indicate that the Succession of James VI
of Scotland to the crown
was an ―unintended consequence
of the machinations of Henry VIII himself.
Be that as it may, some of the new
Settlement of Ulster occurred during Elizabeth‘s reign, with the
Scots coming into Ulster, warring with the Irish and establishing
themselves I the environs of County Armagh, Antrim and the like.
The events which occurred between the
Irish Earls versus the British were taking their toll. To begin with,
William de Burgo(de Burgh), known as the
The Brown Earl,
who was murdered in 1333 and from that point forward the area of
Ulster was in constant conflict into the 17th Century. This De Burgo
must be a descendant of he, who arrived in Ireland, Lord Connaught,
3rd Earl of Ulster, who had removed to Ireland from West Yorshire and
died in 1206. Also, surname of this Family indicates Normal Ancestry.
I must pause to consider that these gents appear to give rise to
another migration from Yorks as a source of frequent immigrant
infusion, for the various reasons: intrigue, power, land and wealth
in Ireland. At any rate, De Burgo (De Burgh) was murdered in 1533 and
from that point on Ulster was intermittently and constantly at
conflict. [20] and [21]
Hugh O‘Neill, born in Ireland,
educated in England, returned in 1585 to Ulster and he, along with
Hugh O‘Donnell, led a rebellion against the British in 1595, though
they failed to accomplish their liberation and were defeated in
battle at Kinsale. This uprising was financed in part by the Spanish,
whose invincible but failed Armada had foundered before accomplishing
anything but its own destruction – largely by weather. Many of the
Spaniards who survived the wrecks of the vessels came ashore in
Scotland and Ireland, apparently some to be taken in and allowed to
live out their lives.
After the events and loss of the
battle at Kinsale, the English forgave the Irish Lords and allowed
them to hold their lands and keeps. However, the Irish Lords
continued in conspiracy with the Spanish continued with plans to free
one of their compatriots who had been imprisoned by Elizabeth I.
Meanwhile, the lands of Armagh and in
general, Ulster, had been ruined by battle, constant conflict and
lack of organized habitation and cultivation.
This constant conflict provided
opportunity which did not go un-noticed. The Scots of the lowland
counties of Scotland, flooded into Ulster. This was used as a force
of influence for settlement in the new world, for example, by the
Virginia Company, of whom one of the investors was to become Lord
Baltimore.
O‘Neill, as mentioned, had
returned, allied with O‘Donnell, and had failed to oust the
British, and due to the removal of the Low-land Scot‘s of Ayrshire
into Counties Down and Antrim and in 1606, a cultural movement of
Presbyter‘s led by James
Hamilton and Hugh Montgomery a major ―schism‖
in its own right was occurring in Ulster, cultural and ethnic
proportion in an area where the local lords were already bristling
against any British authority. It is into these largely vacated and
uncultivated wild lands into which the Scots emerged. This part of
northern Ireland, sans leadership, became the breeding ground of what
would become the Ulster Plantation Settlement of 1610.
As the Scots moved in by the
thousands, a plan to free an imprisoned compatriot, Con O‘Neill,
was hatched in the continued intrigues involving the Irish against
the British. Con O‘Neill had been imprisoned at Carricksfergus by
Elizabeth I who was now deceased and succeeded by James VI Scotland,
now James I of England(son of Mary Queen of Scots. The plan to free
O‘Neill did not come to fruition, despite Spanish support. The Four
Lords who were empowered in Ulster apparently decided to expatriate.
What has become named
the ―Flight of the Earls‖,
these four leaders and nearly 100 major followers who accompanied
them, were to sail from County Donegal, apparently with the idea of
future reprise with aid from the Spaniards. The four Earls Tyrone,
Tyrconell and Fermanagh, respectively Hugh O‘Neall, Rory O‘Donnell,
Cúchonnacht Maguire (this name an apparent name-sake of mythical
figure of Irish Lore); since the effort to free Con O‘Neill and
gain pardon for him from the new English King, had failed. (This plan
was hatched by Hamilton and the group of conspirators apparently
having accomplices in Spain in this venture). [For reference you
might wish to read: The Narrow Ground, by ATQ Stewart
which details the Hamilton and
Montgomery emergence in Ulster. As is observed in his work:
Scotland’s Empire, Published in London, 2003, T.M. Of note are the
Scots who came into Ulster were a cross section of the Population of
Scotland itself, lending to stability and economic growth.
I would venture to see this as a
proper for the Calvert gents of Yorkshire such as Robert and John,
and then followed by Henry in 1623. At any rate, the Scots had
arrived and the Irish Lords had well decided in conspiracy with and
inferred finance of the Spanish Monarch as well. The Earls and their
followers fled in Spanish vessels from Lough Willy, in County
Donegal, setting sail for Spain.
Unfortunately for those fleeing,
misfortune again occurred and the Spanish sailors had to make port on
the Norman Coast -- their woes similar to those that befell the great
Armada. So too did visit misfortune and malady to the conspirators of
Ulster. They were then escorted to Rome from Normandy and
they lived their lives out at the
bequest of papal Edict, with bitter recriminations in their letters
and works.
The sectarian conflicts between the
Irish and British continued though the leaders were gone, the
commoners continued in conflict with the British, the bloodiest
conflict taking place in 1641. [23] The Irish Rebellion of 1641 Thus
in 1606 the Scots had entered the abandoned territories of Ulster
with Great Success. James had succeeded Elizabeth and he was King of
England and Scotland. The Scots took great honor in their part of
this settlement amidst the Irish. That they came from the harsh
country of the north of the British Isle should not be surprise, nor
should, for example, the removal of John Calvert from Morsham or
Henry from the borderland of Scotland and Yorkshire in 1623. It is
noted by some of the administrators of the realm that the Irish
natives were unruly and uncouth, that the people who settled the
highlands of Scotland and northern England were of a perfect
experience for the task at hand. John Calvert settled in County
Armagh which lies north and a bit west of Belfast. [24]
The earliest townlands‖
settled were in the Parish’s of Seagoe and Shankill
In the notes of Gilbert Cope is the
assumption as is indicated by his writing that it was assumed at the
time of the settlement of these Calvert‘s in Ireland that there was
a kinship with the Lord‘s Baltimore. Indeed, George was knighted
due to his service to the King and was given land holdings in County
Langford, Ireland, and was given rank, recognition and later, his
cote de arms was granted for the recently made man, Lord
Baltimore(Sic). Further, the homeland of John Calvert at Morsham is a
short distance from Kiplin Hall, also in Yorkshire. [25]
Gilbert Cope also noted that the
proprietors of Maryland and apparently, the Hollingsworth's,
considered there to be a family tie as is indicated by reference on
the Early Quaker Calvert‘s page. Further, a descendant of Valentine
Hollingsworth was appointed Surveyor For Maryland by the proprietary,
Valentine Hollingsworth wife being a daughter of this line of Calvert
family from Ireland seems to further indicate at least a relationship
Between allied families of Calvert‘s of Quaker faith in
Pennsylvania and Delaware to those of the Lords Baltimore of
Maryland. [26]
The Calvert‘s who became Quaker
settled first in the small parish of Seagoe, where the Hearth Rent
Rolls(Tax list) shows a small number of families in the area. There
are Calvert’s who lived there who to whom research should turn to
discover ancestral origins. This is an indication to me that John
Calvert removed to County Armagh some time prior to 1717 when his son
Thomas was born, so shall we say, likely between 1610 or 1611 and
1616. At this juncture, some of the families are likely kin to John
Calvert and others may or may not be so related. Perhaps the most
succinct notion that the families share ancestry is that many
originated in Yorkshire and settled in Ireland in the same or nearby
Parishes. As time progressed in the plantation settlement effort this
was bound to change but within such a small geographic area it seems
more likely that a good number of the families are related.[27]
In a later epoch, of course, a common
acceptance among the peers of the families which controlled the
Colonies that the Calvert‘s of Chester and New Castle in
Pennsylvania were indeed related to the Calvert‘s Lord Baltimore.
Albert Cook Myers stated in his book:
"In the latter part of the seventeenth century there was a
presumption that such a relationship existed; for on June 4, 1735,
Samuel Hollingsworth of Chester County, made a deposition before the
Mayor of Philadelphia, in connection with a boundary dispute between
the Penn‘s and Lord Baltimore, that in 1683 one Colonel Talbot and
a party of Lord Baltimore's surveyors were the guests one night at
the home of his father, Valentine Hollingsworth, in New Castle
County; and that in the course of conversation during the evening
"the said Talbot enquiring into the Place from whence this
affirmat;s ffather and Mother came and the maiden name of his mother,
which was Calvert, the said Collonel Talbot invited this affirmat's
ffather to come down and live in Maryland, assuring him his Lordship
would be very kind to him on account of his wife's having been a
Calvert." [28]
Among the early Calvert‘s of
Yorkshire settling in Ulster Province was Robert Calvert, he of birth
in Yorkshire, Gent. Robert is the only known Calvert of gentry to
received a 1,000 acre grant of land. Robert transported people to
County Fermanagh in Ulster Province in 1611. Another record shows
that this 1,000 acres was sold before 1620. In 1623 a Henry Calvert
of Yorkshire settled in County Armagh, having removed with family
from the highlands on the border of Scotland and perhaps he was Scot
himself. It is also fact that his descendants who arrived in America
via one family line were Strict Presbyter‘s who took on the lands
and wilds of the time around 1800 in Cortland, New York State.
Research on Henry Calvert's origin is ongoing. It is not known if
this family is tied genetically to the Calvert‘s of any other
branch of the various families. [28, 29]
By 1630 a Number of Calvert‘s are
located to the various counties of the King in Northern Ireland.
These counties now include: Armagh,
Donegal, Cavan, Tyrone, Fermanagh, Derry, Antrim, Down, Monaghan and
Donegal (there were originally 6 counties, which exclude Cavan,
Monaghan and Donegal) 200 years later the Calverts are still
prominent as Freeholders in Ulster-a Survey for the Hearth Tax in
1824 shows that there are 77 Calvert Freeholders in County Armagh
alone. [30]
Robert
Calvert 1610 - Clancally, County Fermanagh
Robert Calvert received a grant of
land in in 1610 and fulfilled with Tenants and Freeholders by 1611 in
County Fermanagh. J. Richard Buckey also wrote that these Calvert’s
were apparently related. According to Reggie,
― Robert Calvert was the
only Calvert to receive Manorial rights in the Ulster Plantation. He
is noted as Robert Calvert, Gent. In a 1611 report to the Kings
Secretary, Robert is noted to have 1,000 acres, to have built a house
with two tenant families and six other families promised to arrive in
May 1612. In a survey of 1620 Robert Calvert can produce 12 men at
arms to the Kings service, hosting a Freeholder, 7 Tenants from which
to draw service.
He might be George, 1st Lord
Baltimore‘s brother…George Calvert surely had the
―clout‘ to secure a grant for Robert.‖
On page 18. I note that it is even more likely that there is a
relationship, based on the fact that George Calvert himself had
proprietary interests in holdings in Ireland. [32]
1610 - Robert Calvert - granted 1,000
acres in Fermanagh in 1610.
1620 - Survey shows 7 tenants, 1
Freeholder and able to raise 12 men at Arms.
1620-22 - Sold his interests in the
granted land.
John
Calvert of Gisbrough, Yorkshire England arrived and settled at Lurgan
Next found is John Calvert of
Gisbrough who removed to Ireland and settled at Lurgan in County
Armagh by 1617. John married Grace [--?--] and lived at Lurgan, died
at some date after 1655. This is determined by the fact that the
Quakers established themselves in Ireland in 1654, and since John was
buried at the Friends Cemetery at Moyraverty, we can at least say
that it is likely that he died after this date. No further record has
been found to establish a firmer date. [33]
The birth of a son, Thomas, was
recorded by the Lurgan Friends Meeting records[1]. John probably died
after 1655 when the Friends meeting had established the burying
grounds(2). John is the progenitor of the Calvert‘s who were
Quaker. It is his son Thomas, himself born in County Armagh, (3) an
apparent convert to the Quaker faith, or likely his mother and
possibly his father. Children of Thomas were born into the Friends
Meeting House in County Armagh. [33, ibid]
J. Richard Buckey felt that Robert
Calvert was very possibly kin to George, Baron of
‗Balmoral‘(Baltimore), stating he was the only Calvert to be
noted as Gent and to have received a grant: ―Robert Calvert
was the only Calvert to receive manorial rights
in the Ulster Plantation. Buckey speculated that Robert was George
Calvert‘s brother, severing relations with his brother due to
George‘s conversion to Catholicism. This conversation had to be of
extreme angst for Baron Baltimore as
he resigned his seat in King James Council but remained an advisory
to the King, apparently showing the trust and faith that James had in
George Calvert. Perhaps this is why Buckey states that the split with
Robert may have occurred due to the religious sectarian divide which
loomed in England between the Protestant and Catholic and even
divisions among the Protestants where the Calvinists were ostracized
by other sects. This religious conflict was ongoing for more than 100
years, resulted in part in King Charle‘s execution
in the ―Glorious Revolution‖
(he followed James as regent), the rise of Cromwell and the War of
the Roses. Indeed, Charles Calvert nearly lost the colony of Maryland
in his own difficulties
related to the sectarian divisions of
England, Scotland and Ireland. He also observed that George had the
clout and import being the secretary to King for Northern Ireland
early in his public service and in part, due to this service related
to the troubles in Ireland George Calvert was Knighted in 1617., his
cote de armes recognized in 1622 as
was his origin from Flanders at Warvickhoe. [13, ibid]
Calverts
Lord Baltimore
That George himself was of high
family is apparent. See the Declaration of his Ancestry on our
website, given in 1622 in George‘s behalf, noting the already
existing cote de arms, apparently from Flanders and is described in
1622 in George‘s exemplification. It is obvious then, that by 1610,
Robert Calvert is already recognized as a man of such stature.
Records of the Plantations from which
we have a list of Calvert‘s settle in Ulster Province or hold
office related to the counties of Northern Ireland in the Ulster
Plantation. George Calvert 1606 - Clerk for 2 counties of Ireland
(George son to be Lord Baltimore). After Knighthood, Samuel Calvert
wrote to George from County Langford. [35]
1610 - Robert Calvert(Of Yorks)was
granted 1,000 Acres at Fermanagh, Clancally townland
1611 - Robert Calvert noted in
assessment report
1613 - King James Assessment and
assistance mission to Ireland related to the raising of revenues from
the Barons and Grantee's of Plantation lands
1617 – Thomas Calvert is born, son
of Thomas and wife Grace (John of of Gisbrough)
1618 - Leonard Calvert - 21 Sep at
Drummaranary, County Armagh.
1622 - Declaration of Heraldic
Ancestry and Cote de Arms of George Calvert of Flanders, Warvickoe.
1622- Robert Calvert sells his
interest in the 1,000 Acre Grant.
1623 - Henry Calvert removes from
border of Yorkshire and Scotland to Ulster 1630 - Robert Calvert -
Seagoe, County Armagh Military Muster
1630 - Edward Calvert - Seagoe,
County Armagh Military Muster
Geographic
Proximity and the Hearth (Tax) Rolls
It is from these Hearth Rent Rolls
that Thomas Calvert can again be found(already proven to be son of
John Calvert of Morsham). Further, it is known, via the research work
of Reggie White, that Thomas lived in Killruigan, John Calvert lived
in Drumgor and a Leonard, unproven son of Thomas lived at Moyraverty
townlands.
Calverts
in Ulster Townlands – Seagoe
The import of the records note above
finds itself firmly positioned in viewing Leonard Calvert of the
early records of the Ulster Plantation. Firstly, he was among the
earliest of Land Holders in Ulster. Secondly, and of great import is
that he stands figuratively with the Calverts who were Quaker and a
potential descendant of the Lords Baltimore Calvert’s due to his
given name which is certainly unusual for the time in question. Also,
he lived nearby to Thomas and John Calvert of the
“Early Quaker or Nordic Calvert’s”
(see the DNA Project for the naming convention alternative – Nordic
Calvert’s).
Whether there is a relationship of
Leonard to the Lords Baltimore, or that he was indeed a brother of
Thomas b 1617 who married Jane Glasford, is unproven.
Townlands are divisions of Cities
within Parishes, thus organized beneath the County level. Other
Calvert’s in the same area of County Armagh near John Calvert of
Guisbrough and Thomas Calvert his son were Edward and Robert who
lived in Seagoe according to the 1630 Military Muster, two individual
me named Christopher Calvert are found on the Hearth Rolls for 1630.
Also found in related records of Yorkshire of a similar generation to
George First Lord Baltimore are: Samuel Calvert and Robert Calvert,
which would add to the list as we have Leonard Calvert noted above
who was among the very earliest of those who relocated to the Ulster
Plantation and who may be kin or perhaps even brothers of George
Calvert b 1578 near Danby on Wisk, Yorkshire England.
A Calvert researcher who descends
from Leonard Calvert of county Armagh, is Reggie White who began
digging into his ancestry stemming from origins in Yorks and Ulster
Plantation. He indicates that Robert Calvert, c 1576 in Yorkshire is
the brother of George as found in IGI database. He also found a
listing for Samuel Wright Calvert c 1579 born near Danby Wiske,
Yorkshire,
England which also indicates that
George b 1578 is a sibling. From Reggie‘s work in addition to that
of myself and Lynn Howser who has dug deeply into the records of
Northern Ireland, adding the two Christopher Calvert’s in Fermanagh
Hearth Roll of 1630 though Reggie also shows that Robert of the same
year as an undertaker via different records, is not on the Fermanagh
Hearth roll. [27, ibid]
In researching the Nordic Calvert’s,
who immigrated from Ireland to New Castle Co Delaware and Chester
County, Pennsylvania, various other Calvert’s are found, such as
Marke Calvert who lived at Tulligally. Some researchers clearly see
that George Calvert, Robert b circa 1585 are both brothers of John
Calvert of Guisbrough and that there is at least the implication that
Leonard Calvert is named for his father.
J. Richard Buckey also wrote that
these Calverts were apparently related.
According to Reggie Wright, Robert
Calvert was the only Calvert to receive Manorial rights in the Ulster
Plantation. He might be George, 1st Lord Batlimore‘s brother…George
Calvert surely had the ―clout‘
to secure a grant for Robert.
On Page 16, The History of the
Calvert’s Who Were Quaker. I note that it is even more likely that
there is a relationship, based on the fact that George Calvert
himself had proprietary interests in holdings in Ireland.
Robert Calvert was granted 1,000
acres in Fermanagh in 1610. In my own research, I searched for
Robert, Samuel, Leonard and a Marke Calvert in Yorkshire. See The
list below of Calvert surnames with given names below.
From another source is the apparent
birth of Robert Calvert 1576 in Yorkshire, also a son of Leonard
Calvert and Alicia [--?--]. All this leads one to conclude that there
is a kinship of the Calvert’s of County Armagh to the family of
George Calvert, First Lord, even that George had siblings John of
Gisbrough, Robert and Samuel of Fermanagh, as well as Marke Calvert
brother, this Marke having a son Leonard, named for his own father,
if he followed the traditional naming convention.
With this in consideration, a letter
in public records of Ulster Province of 1611 from Samuel Calvert to
Brother George points to George also being a sibling, and as can be
seen by the list above, a George Calvert is clearly holding lands in
County Armagh. [38] The property is listed as occupied by George
Ridgeway, grantee of Robert Calvert. It is possible that Robert
vacated the Fermanagh grant, because, for one reason or another, he
found the conditions of the grant (settlers, fortifications,
buildings) too stringent to accomplish in the time stipulated).
Because consideration of this early
Robert Calvert receiving land by grant from King James, and due his
apparent death 15 April, 1632 (place not recorded), it is considered
that he would thus be absent from the Seagoe 1664 Hearth Rent Roll,
which he is. With this in mind, one might speculate that the Co.
Armagh holdings occupied by Leonard and/or Marke CALVERT in 1664 were
part of an estate originally occupied by Robert. It was found to have
been
sold by 1620 but also a progress
report for the grant was made in 1620. As to whether George Calvert
was involved is at least, possible for the grant was after he was
knighted George Lord Baltimore which was partially due to his work
with the Irish settlements of Ulster as well as the apparent family
honor of title before this event as can easily be seen by a later
recognition of George‘s honorable ancestry. George did indeed have
influence on the Kings Court and Commissions, he was certainly
heavily involved in Irish Affairs for the crown an ally of Sir Robert
Cecil and Cecil did have influence with James I. Further, Public
records of Ireland have the letter written by Samuel to
George Calvert his brother Ref: D,
3250, indicating that Samuel is George‘s Agent in Ireland acting in
behalf of George‘s interests. [Ibid]
Calverts
in Ulster to 1664
Researcher Reggie White, from whom a
great deal of information is found at Rootsweb pages states: that if
we take into account deaths and the immigration of the Quaker
CALVERTS, it would appear that Leonard (in Moyraverty) and Marke (in
Tulligally) provided the 1664 baselines from which local CALVERT
lineage thereafter developed -- here I believe we must include John
Calvert b1648 who married Judith Stamper and removed From County
Armagh to New Castle Co DE along with some of his children. Indeed,
next in consideration is that some of John
Children were born to the Quaker Faith as records of Lurgan show.
That the Faith was instituted in Ireland about 1655 and that John
Calvert, grandfather of John Calvert was buried at the Quaker Burying
grounds in Ulster must absolutely be considered.
In the circumstances of birth, the
Calvert Surname Project at least shows to this point that the DNA of
the descendants of George Calvert does not and cannot match that of
those descended from John Calvert as sharing a common ancestor. This
does not mean that the genetic lineage is proof - it proves that the
DNA for the two lines is not the same - different family lines or
accident of birth being the cause. The Calvert Research Group (Now at
Facebook) and the Calvert Surname Project at familytreedna.com, has
yet to obtain a proven Primary source documented Calvert from either
line as being kin. This further complicates drawing any final
conclusion EXCEPT to state that the Calvert’s Lord Baltimore and
the “Quaker” Calvert’s are not kin. The results to date may
mean that there are 3 distinct Calvert families or more who are
involved in the Ulster Plantation - at least genetically distinct.
Leonard
Calvert of Moyraverty and Marke in Tulligally
Leonard Calvert is thought by some to
be the son of Robert Calvert, the earliest settler in Ulster
Plantation among the Calvert’s and who received the grant
from King James. Reggie on the other had believes that it is more
likely that Christopher is the father of Leonard b May 31 1636 at
Stokesley in
Yorkshire and that Marke was a son of Robert. He notes: ―…there
are strong indications that
they were related, but the nature of that relationship is not known.
Conceivably, Leonard could have been the son of Robert, but it seems
more likely that he was the son of Christopher.
The time frame is compatible and his older namesakes
were deceased - one in 1642 and the other in 1647. On the face of it,
he was the only Leonard CALVERT around at the time (if we exclude the
Leonard Calvert who was present in 1630 in the military Muster. As
for Marke, I lean to the thought that he was possibly the son of
Robert.
From the research in the Calvert
Genealogy Research Group members, we know we have Robert passed down
in at least three significant lines:
The Calverts who were Quaker of
Chester County, PA, and of Nordic DNA. This is a completely distinct
genetic group from the multiple claimant subgroups who define their
ancestry as being of the “Lord’ Baltimore”.
Another example: The Calvert’s of
Ireland and Botetourt County, VA. DNA evidence to date demonstrates
this as a distinct group of Calvert’s who are not Nordic, whose DNA
is distinct from other groups including those descended or who claim
descendance from the Lord’s Baltimore. This group Calvert Genealogy
refers to as the Calvert’s of This Calvert ancestry as origins in
Ireland. It is stated in the research that 3 brothers at least as
well as cousins arrived from Ireland. Dewel Lott’s multi-volume
research provides a good starting point for this ancestral group:
“Our Calvert Kin”. Since then, much detail has been discovered
via the DNA project and researchers digging into this family’s
ancestry. They are from Ireland, but genetically, are not kin to the
Quaker Calvert’s.
The Calvert’s Botetourt Co VA are
directly involved in the migration from Virginia to Sevier County
Tennessee. At present, there is an extensive research effort ongoing
for this family group including continued effort to add to the
participants for the DNA Project.
Leonard
and Marke Calvert of Ulster
When Reggie Wright, Peter Calvert and
I were exchanging information, and attempting to further define the
Calvert‘s of Ulster in 2004-2005, we commonly assented to the view
that it was most likely true that the Calvert‘s of different family
lines were related even though genetic information demonstrated
otherwise. We were unable to further define this except to say that
only so many circumstances are truly circumstance. When considering
the results of the DNA project to that point. Since then, we have
more evidence and it continues to grow but remains woefully
inadequate at this point in time. One must also consider that the
sample population remains much too small to be effective except in
measured instances and even with this evidence, accidents of birth
with questionable paternity must always be part of the corresponding
evaluation.
Reggie concludes that the first
Leonard born at Danby Wiske, son of John Calvert and Dorothy
Margerie, noting it was at least it was Reasonably to believe that
the name given him was unique to the family at that time, that it had
the purpose of honoring his mother and that its use on successive
occasions with his grandchildren (1610 and 1636) reaffirmed its
special significance.
Certainly, as has proven over
and over again, the Calvert’s did use a naming convention of naming
sons for grandfathers and using the names of Uncles and brothers-over
and over again. Leonard Calvert in County Armagh at least presents
substantial reason to pursue the relationship of these Calverts in
Ireland to George Calvert, First Lord.
Again, DNA evidence makes my current
view stick with two distinct family lines. For the Quaker Calverts’,
Robert is a given name in common to multiple descents from Ireland to
the Colonies and beyond. This is not the case for the Calvert’s
Lord Baltimore.
Post-1664
Calvert data
Reggie‘s research finds more
information in Ireland in Seagoe Parish records, post 1664, Two
separate Leonard Calvert‘s born 1696 and believes that this can be
divided into two lines of Descent - one from Leonard of Moyraverty
and the other Marke of Tulligally. He also found a Leonard is found
in the following years: 1726, 1749, 1761, 1778, 1796, 1806,
1827,1854, 1857, 1872, 1885, 1891.
The second point to be considered
concerns the Leonard CALVERT, whose name appears on the 1664 Seagoe
Parish Hearth Money Roll, as well as the 1673 Quaker Indenture
mentioned above. This Leonard Calvert, Reggie concludes b 1636, was
the son of Christopher Calvert and lived in the same small Parish at
the same time as Thomas, John and Ann Calvert who married Valentine
Hollingsworth, Giving at least the strong possibility that all of
these Calvert’s were descendants of the Calverts of Yorkshire. [39]
Geographic
Proximity and the Hearth (Tax) Rolls
It is from these Hearth Rent Rolls
that Thomas Calvert can again be found (already proven to be son of
John Calvert of Morsham). Further, it is known, via the research work
of Reggie White, a Descendant of Leonard of County Armagh, that
Thomas lived in Killruigan, John Calvert lived in Drumgor and a
Leonard, unproven son of Thomas lived at Moyraverty townlands.
Some
Calverts of Yorkshire - Future
additions to be made: Newcastle-on-tyne, Yorkshire, and the Merchant
Adventurers of Newcastle
From Yorkshire: Index to PLYMOUTH: A
New History by Crispin Gill – Devon Books (1993) ISBN 0 86114 8827-
Index prepared by Brian Bigmore Calverley.
Parish Registers, Burials 1596 to
1720; note: Numerous Calverley's noted in the county records as well
as these Calvert’s.
? Infant of William Calvert Idle
Parke 1677 04 03
Alice Daughter of Isabel Calvert Idle
Parke 1675 10 28
Alice Wife of Samuel Calvert Thackley
1700 04 12
George Calvert of Farsley 1710 07 25
George Calvert of Idle 1718 06 15
'slain by lightning'
James Calvert of Farsley 1713 08 09
Jane Wife of William Calvert Idle
1701 10 19
John Calvert of Calverley 1672 11 25
John Calvert of Farsley 1713 09 08
Martha Daughter of William Calvert
Idle 1697 02 07
Samuel Calvert of Pudsey 1665 04 10
Samuel Son of William Calvert Idle
1689 04 05
Samuel Son of Samuel Calvert Idle
1695 03 25
Samuel Calvert of Thackley 1701 12 28
Sarah Daughter of David Calvert
Greengates 1710 03 10
Sarah Daughter of James Calvert Idle
Park 1711 09 05
Sarah Calvert of Farsley 1713 08 17
widow
Thomas Son of Thomas Calvert Thackley
1695 04 23
William Calvert of Idle Park 1711 09
10
PLYMOUTH
BAPTISMS,
Yorkshire, Calverley PE, All legible Baptisms and Births recorded at
the Parish Church of Calverley for families in the
Idle/Thackley/Windhill area 1726 to
1745. extracted by Colin Hinson.
(SAME
PARISH) from LDS MF 990548 PE records of Plymouth:
20 Mar 1733/34 CALVERT Elizabeth
Baptism Calverley Daughter of Samuel Thackley Cordwainer
10 Aug 1740 CALVERT John Baptism
Calverley Son of John Idle Thorp Clothier
06 Nov 1743 CALVERT Martha Baptism
Calverley Daughter of Samuel Idle Cordwainer
05 Nov 1738 CALVERT Ruth Baptism
Calverley Daughter of Samuel Thackley ?
26 Dec 1731 CALVERT Sarah Baptism
Calverley Daughter of Samuel Thackley Clothier
THE
INDEX BY GROOM OF THE REGISTER OF MARRIAGES IN YORK MINSTER
1681 to 1762. extracted by Colin
Hinson. - extracted by Colin Hinson. Index by Groom:
1735 Calvert Thomas, Sarah Ingram
INDEX
BY BRIDE
508 Calvert Eliz. & Potter, John
567 Calvert Jane & Siddall,
Joshua
857 Calvert Margaret Kirk John
1259 Calvert Mary Rhodes Wm
STOCKON-ON-TEES
- Yorkshire Baptisms 1637 1780
Compiled by Paul Joiner.
Stockton-on-Tees "This parish was anciently included in that of
Norton, and contained a chapel-of-ease to the mother-church...
CALVART, Elizabeth - Leonard, 20 Aug
1653
CALVERT, Ann - Robert + Hannah, 5 Apr
1767
CALVERT, David - David, 23 Mar 1739
CALVERT, Frances - Leonard, 29 Apr
1658
CALVERT, Isabell - Leonard, 7 Apr
1651
CALVERT, Jane - Leonard, 22 Dec 1655
CALVERT, Mary - Jonathan + Frances
(25 Jul 1780), 17 Sep 1780
CALVERT, Mary - Robert, 14 Jul 1771
CALVERT, Robert - Leonard, 25 Aug
1660
CALVERT, Robert - Robert + Hannah (11
Jan 1777), 13 Feb 1777
CALVERT, Robert - William + Ann,
Mister, 10 Sep 1759
CALVERT, Sarah - William + Ann,
Mister, 3 Feb 1763
Transcript from
St. John's Parish Register - Salton
and Brawby, Vale of Pickering, NRY - Baptisms 1701-1750.
585 Mar-01 1702 Calvert Rebeka(*h)
John Salton
596 Oct-05 1704 Calvert Judith John
610 Jul-13 1707 Calvert John
SALTON
- Transcript from St. John's Parish Register, Salton and Brawby,
Vale of Pickering, NRY –
Baptisms 1651-1700
484 Mar-05 1676 Calvert Mary George
Salton
573 Oct-08 1699 Calvert Ann John
Salton
Marriages from
the South Shields St Hilda Registers (1700-1749)
This listing is produced from an index that was originally prepared
by Bill Rounce made available to GENUKI by George Bell from his large
collection of Northumberland and Durham indexes.
2 May 1725 John Calvert = Ann
Wilkinson
27 May 17?? Thomas Bolton = Mary
Calvert
[40] records extracted by the
compiler
FOOTNOTES:
[Xxb] J.S.
Futhey - The History of the Smedley Family -
Published in 1901, Wickersham printing co., Lancaster, Pa, 1091,
LCCN: 02017584.
[xxc]
- (Samuel
Lightfoot Smedley, 1732-1984 From Old Catalog, a genealogy-Futhey
Xxd]
Genealogy of the Dutton Family, et al – Gilbert Cope, - 112 p,
1871, FS Hickman, Printer
[xxe] A record of the Cope family –
Gilbert Cope, 1861, King and Baird, printers, Philadelphia, PA,
CS71.C782 1861
[Xxe] Genealogy of the sharlpes
Family – Gilbert Cope, 1333p; - LC CS71 .S532 1887
[Xxf] History of Chester County PA;
Cope, Futhey and Futhey, 1995, Heritage Books, ISBN 0788402064
[1] According to Lewis' Topographical
Dictionary published in 1831
[2] Birthplace Yorkshire – source
[3] Source for John Calvert’s
burial at Moyraverty
[3] Record of birth for Thomas
recorded - Lurgan Friends Meeting records.
[4] Scot Presbyter’ settlement in
Ulster in 1606
[5] The Scotch-Irish: The Scot in
North Britain, North Ireland, and America Vol.1, NY: Hanna, Charles
A. 1902
[6] Bloodiest year of conflict
between the Irish Commoners and the English and Scots
[7] Penn Meeting quotation source
needed here.
[8] Research reference for Henry
Calvert – research of Compiler
[9] Historical source for the Ulster
formation counties needs to be added
[10] Research source for Robert
Calvert
[11] The Immigration of Irish Quakers
Into Pennsylvania, Myers, A. C.
[12] The History of the Calvert’s
Who Were Quaker Buckey, J. R. 1991.
[13] Sir Richard St. George Norroy,
George Calvert Granted Knight, cote de arms - 3 Dec 1622 Declaration
– the Family Origin, including the existing cote de arms which was
incorporated into the cote de arms for his granted lands in Ireland.
Norroy observes the family to have origin at Warvickoe in the Earldom
of Flanders, Netherlands - See attachment 1 for the full quotation.
[14] Sources for Robert Calvert’s
grant: Research of David Bell, Peter Calvert, Reggie White – Irish
Source Records.
[15] Conrad Russell's “James VI and
I and rule over two kingdoms: an English view”. This article first
appeared in Der Herrsher in der Dopplepflicht; Eu :
Europäische Fürsten und ihre Beiden Throne,
ed. H. Duchhardt (Mainz, 1997), pp. 123-37, and is reproduced in
English for the
first time in the IHR's journal of
Historical Research.
[19] “Correspondence of King James
VI of Scotland with Sir Robert Cecil and Others In England During the
Reign of Queen Elizabeth – John Bruce, pub Camden Society,
Longmans, and Green, etc. London, 1860-61”]
[20] The Native Irish and English law
in Medieval Ireland Vol VII. No 25, March 1950
[21] – The website for chronicling
the history of Ulster on the web:
http://www.cruithni.org.uk/faq/faq.html - as they note: Cruithni is
the plural of the medieval Irish word Cruithin. The other spelling
often used is Cruthin. The original word was Pritani in P-Celtic or
Prydyn in Welsh. The Pictish Chronicle records the legend that the
Picts in Scotland were founded by a king named Cruithne, son of
Cinge. However, it is doubtful whether there is any link between the
Cruithni in Ulster and the Picts in Scotland.
[22 “Scotland’s Empire:
1600-1815” - TM Devine, Publisher Allan Lane, London, ISBN
10:0713994983]
[23] “The Story of Ireland”,
Sullivan, A.M., publisher M H Gill and Son, 1907 - Dublin, Ireland;
this work was published posthumously but contains
some very good material related to
Irish History and Lore.
[24] Notes and references, Fr. Huger,
now deceased, Rockhurst University, 1975.
[25]
History of
Chester County, Pa with Genealogical & Biographical Sketches by
Gilbert Cope, John Smith Futhey, J. Smith Futhey - Heritage
Books Inc,
May 1995 Paperback.
[26] Notes on Research, various
volumes, Gilbert Cope, et al.
[27] research by David Bell, Jim Ray,
Lynn Howser, Sylvia Whitaker – Various source Documents copies of
which were extracted, copied or or transcribed.
[28] source of quote needs to be
added
[29] Documented research from Records
of Ireland – research by David Bell
{30] The Council book of the
Corporation of Youghal: from 1610 to 1659, from 1666 to 1687, and
from 1690 to 1800. Edited from the original with Annals and
Appendices, Rich’d Caulfield – J Billings and Sons, Printers,
Guildford, Surrey, England 1878
[31] add reference for the formation
of the Ulster Counties – See attachment 3, description of the
Ulster Counties.
[32] Collected Records – Robert
Calvert, Gent of Yorkshire – 1,000 acre Grant, see also Attachment
2.
[33] specific page ref, Buckey
[34] not added yet
[35] Letters of Samuel Calvert to Sir
George Calvert – from County Langford – The Calvert Papers
Calvert Papers, extracted by Compiler
[36] Research: Reggie White
Collection of records.
[37] “The Scotch-Irish: The Scot in
North Britain, North Ireland, and America Vol. 1” Hanna, Charles A.
, N Y, 1902
[38]The extract of this letter,
courtesy of: Nicholas Pynner's Survey of 1619
rootsweb.com/~nirfer/plantation.htm
[39] Research records extracted by
Reggie White and the compiler
[40] extracted records, David Bell
The Origins of
the Family Calvert of Yorkshire, Sir George Calvert, Knight
George Calvert Granted Knight of Arms 3 Dec 1622 Declaration – the
Family Origin at Warvickoe in the Earldom of Flanders, Netherlands As
transcribed by David E. Bell
1 Dec 2009
The grant of arms to Sir George
Calvert, first Lord Baltimore, on Dec 3, 1622 by "Sir Richard
St. George Norroy, Kinge of Arms of the North parts of the Realme of
England from the riuer Trent Northward," shows that the Calvert
family was one of great antiquity. It states in part...
"I fynd the right Honourable Sir
George Caluert Knight one of his majesties principall Secretrayes of
State and his ancestors to hauve resided in the North partes of this
Kingdom, and not only to haue lived in the Ranks and reputacon of
gent and bene bearers of such badges and Ensignes of honour amongst
vs, but further haue seene an exact collection made by Mr. Rirchard
Verstegan an antiquarie in Antwerpe sent ouer this last March 1622 by
which it appeareth that the said Sir George is descended of a Noble
and antiente familie of that Surname in the Earldome of fflanders
where they haue liued long in great Hono(u)r, and haue had great
posessions, their principall and antiente Seate being in Warvickoe in
the said Province And that in this and later tymes two brethren of
that surname vid: Jaques Calvert Lord of Senere two leagues from
Guant remayned in the Netherland, Broyles on the side of the King of
Spayne and hath a sonne who at this present is in honourable place
and office in the Parliament Court at Macklyn, and Levinus Caluert
the other brother tooke parte with the States of Holland and was by
them employed as their Agent with Henry the fourth late Kinge of
France, which Levinus Caluert left a sonne in France whom the
foresaid Kinge of France entertayned as a gentleman of his bed
chamber And further it is tesefied by the said Mr. Verstegan that the
proper Armes belonging to the familie of the Caluert is, or, three
martlets Sables with this Creast vizt the vpper parte or halues of
the two Launces the bandroll of Sir George "Caluert Knight to
make a trve declaracon to posterity of what I haue seene concerninge
the worthyness of his ancestors, that it may remayne to posterity,
from whence they originally descended as also this instant there is
three of that Surname and lyniage lyvinge in thre severall countyes
beinge all men of great emenencey and honourable ymployment in the
State where they liue, which otherwayes by a general neglect might in
future tyme be forgotten and the honour of their ancestors buried in
oblivion And withall for a better maifestacon and memorall of the
familie from whence he is descended, the said Sir George Caluert is
likewise desireous to add some part of those honourable badges and
ensignes of honour which descend vpon him from his ancestors there to
those wich he and his predecessors haue formerlye borne here since
their cumminge into England. The premises considered I the said
Norroy Jinge of Armes haue thought fit not only to publishe by this
declarcon what hath come to my hands and knowledge concerninge the
honour of this worthye familie but also to add to the Coate of Armes
which they haue borne here in England beinge paley of sixpeices, or
and Sables a bend counterchanged this Creast ensuinge, Vizt the vpper
parte of two halfe lances or, with Sables standing in a Ducall Crowne
gules, as more playnly appeareth depicted in the margent, and is the
antiente Creaste descended vnto him from his ancestors..."
p1107 as originally pubished Vol XI X
Second Series PA Archives, Harrisburg, 1893 LCCN 76-15827 Pub
Clearfield Co, 1997 Baltimore M D.
Additional
Notes for Robert Calvert:
“Mem: That Robert Calvert, Esq., of
Mount Calvert, Co, Fermanaugh being a freeman of the corporation, was
1 May 1625, sworn and admitted a counselor, and to be reputed as such
on all meetings of the Mayor, & c.” Page 106.
This indenture, made 3, May 1606,
between Sir Richd. Boyle, Kt., Fermor of the New College of our Ladie
of Youghal, on the one part, and Elizabeth Boyle, als, seckerston, of
Kilcoran, Co. Corke, widow, on the other part. Witnesseth that the
said Sir. R Boyle hath set to said Elizabeth all the mess. Of
Kilcoran, &c., To have for 61 years, yielding yearly to said Sir
Richard, in the hall of the New College of YOughal, 2s. 6d. In
Witness, &c.,
Richard Boyle. Present—Ro. Calvert.
Recordatur ad insantiam Hen. Tynte, are et Ric. Smith, ar. 6 May
1648.” – From the chapter; The Sufferings of the Garrison, page
276.
Additional
notes for Footnote 31
]The following description of the
Counties of Ulster was written by Marshal Sir Henry Bagnal in 1586.
Fermanagh- "The Countie of
Farnmanaghe conteyneth all Farmanaghe, Tyrmingraghe, and Tyrmyn
Omungan. The Capten of all this Countie is Sir Conohour McGwyer, left
alwaies to the commandment and rule of Tur[logh] Oneyle, and yet he
very desirious to depend on the quene. He is able to make (and most
of his own nation) 80 horsemen, 240 shot, and 300 kerne. His countrye
for the most part is very strong of woods and bogge, especially nere
the great lake called Earne, wherein is divers ilands, full of
woodes. Buildinges in this countrye, non of importance."
Precincts
of Clancally – 5000 a.
1) 1000 acres to Sir Hugh Wirrall,
Yorkshire and Middlesex
2) 1000 acres to Robert Bogas,
Suffolkshire. Sold before 1620
3) 1000 acres to Robert Calvert,
gent. Sold before 1620
4) 1000 acres to John Sedborough,
Esq.
5) 1000 acres to Thomas Flowerdewe,
Esq., Norfolk
Precincts
of Clancally and Lurg and Coolemakernan
Thomas Flowerdew, 2000 acres; is
resident, has brought over two freeholders and five fine copyholders;
he cast a trench about an old Rath, and is building an English house,
of 50 feet long and 22 broad, providing materials. Edward Warde, 1000
acres; has not appeared, nor any for him; nothing done. Thomas
Plumsteed has made over his portion to Sir Hugh Worrall; nothing
done. Thomas Chiney, 1000 acres, has not appeared, nor any one for
him; nothing done. Henry Gunning [Honynge], 1000 acres; has taken
possession, but nothing done. John Sedborough, 1000 acres, is
resident with his wife and family; has brought over two freeholders,
one leaseholder, and three copyholders; felled timber, raised stones,
set up an oven, and two chimneys in his house, and intends to go in
hand with his bawne. Robert Calvert, 1000 acres; is
resident; has built a house after the
English manner. Has two families of English, unto whom he will give
estates. Six other families have promised to come unto him at May
next. Robert Bogas, 1000 acres; has not appeared, nor any for him;
nothing done. John Archdale, 1000
acres; the like.
English
Undertakers:
Precinct of Clancally
1. 1000 acres, Sir Hugh Wirrall; a
bawn of stone built 60 feet square; and small stone house within,
standing waste; no tenants.
2. 1000 acres, Edward Hatton (grantee
of Robert Bogas); strong stone house and bawn; water mill; village of
10 houses; 2 freeholders (Nicholas Willoughby was one of these in
1629), 5 lessees, 8 cottagers; able to produce 20 men with arms.
3. 1000 acres, George Ridgeway
(grantee of Robert Calvert); a stone bawn building; 1 freeholder, 7
lessees; able to produce 12 men with arms.
4. 1000 acres, John Sedborough; a
poor sod bawn; 6 lessees, said to be 12 more; able to produce 24 men.
[The names of several British tenants are mentioned in the
Inquisitions of Ulster, Fermanagh, as occupying lands on this
proportion about the year 1630; Hugh Stokes, Clinton Maunde, Robert
Allen, Faithful Teate, Christopher Gascoine, Robert Newcomen, William
Stamers, Stephen Allen, Randulph Daye, John and Thomas Tybbals, Toby
Vesie, Joseph Dickinson]
5. 1000 acres, Thomas Flowerdewe;
small stone house and large stone bawn; village of 5 houses; 2
freeholders, 14 lessees; able to produce 40 men.
Total of Clancally Precinct; 5
freeholders, 44 lessees, 8 cottagers; able to produce 96 men with
arms.
No comments:
Post a Comment